Smoking cessation intervention in the community pharmacy: Cost-effectiveness of a non-randomized cluster-controlled trial at 12-months' follow-up.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of an intervention based on a training course for community pharmacists and a smoking cessation service (CESAR©), using limited societal and the health provider perspectives. METHODS: Non-randomized controlled trial of 12-months' follow-up. Spanish community pharmacists who were previously trained with CESAR© formed the intervention group (n = 102), and control group delivered usual care (n = 80). CESAR Patients were smokers identified by the community pharmacists when they attended the pharmacy. Data were self-reported. Outcomes were smoking cessation and quality-of-life (EQ-5D-3L) and were collected at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Costs data included direct health costs, work loss, and intervention costs. Smoking cessation was analyzed through logistic regression models. Generalized linear models were carried out for quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and costs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 800 smoking patients were included in the intervention group and 278 in the control group. Of these, 487 and 151 patients completed the study, respectively. Costs were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group in both perspectives. At 12 months, 54.3% and 37.1% patients from the intervention and the control groups reported smoking cessation, respectively. The difference in probability of cessation in the intervention compared to the control group was 17.6% (CI:0.05; 0.25). The mean QALY was higher in the intervention group [0.03(CI: 0.01; 0.07)]. The ICER and the ICUR were dominant for the intervention group. CONCLUSION: This intervention for smoking cessation showed that the CESAR© intervention, that combined a training for community pharmacists with a smoking cessation service was efficient for smoking cessation and QALY at 12 months' follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05461066, retrospectively registered (July 15, 2022).

Current expert opinion and attitudes to optimize telemedicine and achieve control in patients with asthma in post-pandemic era: The COMETA consensus / Opinión de los expertos para optimizar el control y la telemedicina en pacientes con asma en era pospandémica: consenso COMETA

Objective: To collect perspectives and explore consensus for expert recommendations related to asthma control and the use of telemedicine among professionals who manage patients with asthma. Design: A Delphi-like questionnaire was designed to analyse the level of agreement about several recommendations formulated by an expert scientific committee about asthma control and the use of telemedicine with this purpose. A dedicated scientific committee validated the questionnaire, which included questions about the participants’ profile and the use of technological tools at a personal level or in clinical practice. The experts expressed their agreement with a Likert-scale of 9 values: 1–3 was considered no agreement, 4–6 neutral, and 7–9 agreement. A rate ≥70% with the same answer was considered consensus. Site: The questionnaire was programmed and distributed as an internet-based survey.Participants: A pre-selected sample of 75 experts with experience in telemedicine (pulmonology, allergology, family medicine, nursing and community pharmacy) responded to a Delphi-like questionnaire composed by six questions and 52 items. Interventions: Consultation was performed in two consecutive waves: the first wave was carried out from 12th of July to 8th of September of 2021; the second wave, from 25th of October to 12th of November of 2021. Main measurements: Three questions about asthma control (actions for achieving or maintaining control of asthma at every visit, current problems that affect asthma control, and potential solutions to offset such problems), and three questions about the impact of telemedicine in asthma control (potential benefits of telemedicine, and potential reticence about telemedicine among both patients and healthcare professionals) were included. Results: From the 52 items inquired, 35 were agreed by consensus.(AU)

Objetivos: Recoger las perspectivas y explorar el consenso de los expertos en las recomendaciones para un mejor control del asma y el uso de la telemedicina entre los profesionales que tratan pacientes con asma. Diseño: Se diseñó un cuestionario con la metodología Delphi para analizar el nivel de acuerdo en varias recomendaciones formuladas por un comité científico experto sobre el asma y el uso de la telemedicina. Un comité experto validó el cuestionario, que incluyó preguntas sobre el perfil de los participantes y el uso de las herramientas tecnológicas a nivel personal y en la práctica clínica. Los expertos expresaron su acuerdo con una escala de Likert de 9 valores: 1-3 se consideró sin acuerdo, 4-6 neutral y 7-9 de acuerdo. Se consideró consenso cuando ≥70% de los participantes respondieron la misma respuesta. Ubicación: La consulta se realizó online. Participantes: Una muestra preseleccionada de 75 expertos con experiencia en telemedicina (neumología, alergología, medicina familiar, enfermería y farmacia comunitaria) respondió a un cuestionario formado por 6 preguntas y 52 ítems. Intervenciones: La consulta se realizó en dos olas consecutivas: la primera ola tuvo lugar desde el 12 de julio al 8 de septiembre de 2021. Y la segunda ola, del 25 de octubre al 12 de noviembre de 2021. Medidas principales: En el cuestionario se incluyeron tres preguntas sobre el control del asma (acciones para lograr y/o mantener el control del asma, problemas actuales que afectan a este control y las posibles soluciones), y tres preguntas sobre el impacto de la telemedicina en el control del asma (potenciales beneficios de la telemedicina y la posible reticencia a telemedicina entre los pacientes y los profesionales sanitarios). Resultados: De los 52 ítems consultados, en 35 de ellos se alcanzó el consenso. Se acordaron por consenso las acciones para lograr o mantener el control del asma, los problemas que afectan al control del asma y sus posibles soluciones.(AU)

Current expert opinion and attitudes to optimize telemedicine and achieve control in patients with asthma in post-pandemic era: The COMETA consensus.

OBJECTIVE: To collect perspectives and explore consensus for expert recommendations related to asthma control and the use of telemedicine among professionals who manage patients with asthma. DESIGN: A Delphi-like questionnaire was designed to analyse the level of agreement about several recommendations formulated by an expert scientific committee about asthma control and the use of telemedicine with this purpose. A dedicated scientific committee validated the questionnaire, which included questions about the participants' profile and the use of technological tools at a personal level or in clinical practice. The experts expressed their agreement with a Likert-scale of 9 values: 1-3 was considered no agreement, 4-6 neutral, and 7-9 agreement. A rate ≥70% with the same answer was considered consensus. SITE: The questionnaire was programmed and distributed as an internet-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: A pre-selected sample of 75 experts with experience in telemedicine (pulmonology, allergology, family medicine, nursing and community pharmacy) responded to a Delphi-like questionnaire composed by six questions and 52 items. INTERVENTIONS: Consultation was performed in two consecutive waves: the first wave was carried out from 12th of July to 8th of September of 2021; the second wave, from 25th of October to 12th of November of 2021. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Three questions about asthma control (actions for achieving or maintaining control of asthma at every visit, current problems that affect asthma control, and potential solutions to offset such problems), and three questions about the impact of telemedicine in asthma control (potential benefits of telemedicine, and potential reticence about telemedicine among both patients and healthcare professionals) were included. RESULTS: From the 52 items inquired, 35 were agreed by consensus. The actions for achieving or maintaining control of asthma, the problems that affect asthma control, and their potential solutions were agreed by consensus. The potential benefits of telemedicine were validated by consensus. None of the potential reservations of patients about telemedicine were validated, while five out of 14 potential reservations of healthcare professionals were agreed by consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The COMETA consensus provides a current picture of the main problems for achieving asthma control, the benefits and the reservations about the use of telemedicine in the Spanish setting, and offers solutions. A wide interest in implementing telemedicine has been observed, although current limitations need to be overcome.

Actualización del papel del farmacéutico comunitario en el manejo del paciente asmático / Update on the role of the community pharmacist in the management of the asthmatic patient

El asma es una de las enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles más frecuentes a nivel mundial, siendo además la más prevalente de las enfermedades crónicas respiratorias. En España se estima que la prevalenciageneral del asma en niños es de un 10% y de cerca del 5% en edad adulta. Los pacientes afectados poresta enfermedad presentan una peor calidad de vida, menor productividad laboral y más comorbilidadesasociadas, y a pesar de las mejoras acontecidas en las últimas décadas en el manejo y tratamiento de estapatología, y a que se considera al asma como una enfermedad manejable y tratable, todavía se siguenproduciendo muertes por ataques de asma. Llegados a este punto, es donde aparece la figura del farmacéutico comunitario que atendiendo a su formación y al particular emplazamiento donde desarrolla sulabor asistencial, puede y debe jugar un papel decisivo en el abordaje del paciente asmático en atenciónprimaria con el fin de colaborar activamente con otros profesionales sanitarios para ayudar a revertir lasituación actual. Ese abordaje podría realizarse a través de diferentes intervenciones a desarrollar dentrodel servicio integral de atención al paciente asmático, como son: el cribado de pacientes asmáticos nodiagnosticados, la detección de situaciones de riesgo y de pacientes con asma poco o mal controlada,la detección de pacientes en situación de sobreuso o abuso de medicación de rescate, la detección depacientes con baja adhesión al tratamiento antiinflamatorio con corticoides inhalados, la revisión del usode los dispositivos de inhalación, la educación sanitaria y la ayuda en la obtención de planes de acciónpersonalizados por escrito. (AU)

Asthma is one of the most common chronic non-communicable diseases worldwide, being also the mostprevalent chronic respiratory disease. In Spain, the overall prevalence of asthma in children is estimatedto be 10% and around 5% in adults. Patients affected by this disease have a poorer quality of life, lowerwork productivity and more associated comorbidities, and despite the improvements that have occurredin recent decades in the management and treatment of this pathology, and despite the fact that asthma isconsidered a manageable and treatable disease, deaths from asthma attacks are still occurring. It is at thispoint that the figure of the community pharmacist comes into play. Given their training and the particularlocation where they develop their activity, they can and should play a decisive role in the approach toasthma patients in primary care in order to actively collaborate with other healthcare professionals tohelp to reverse the current situation. This approach could be carried out through different interventionswithin the comprehensive asthmatic patient care service, such as; screening of undiagnosed asthmaticpatients, detection of risk situations and patients with poorly or poorly controlled asthma, detection ofpatients in a situation of over-reliance in rescue medication, detection of patients with low adherence toanti-inflammatory treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, review of the use of inhalation devices, healtheducation, and help in obtaining personalised written action plans. (AU)

[Multidisciplinary Consensus for the Monitoring and Control of Asthma Through Telemedicine. The COMETA Project]. / Consenso multidisciplinar para el seguimiento y control del asma mediante la telemedicina. El proyecto COMETA.

Despite the therapeutic advances currently available, asthma control is poor. Such control is based on assessing the patient, adjusting treatment, and reviewing the response to treatment. In normal situations, asthma is monitored and controlled by sequential face-to-face visits. However, due to biosecurity and distancing measures to avoid disease transmission during a pandemic, such monitoring and control is limited. This is how tele-assistance, which is available from extensive published evidence in asthma, has emerged. Even so, it should not be understood as a substitute for face-to-face consultations, but as a complementary alternative to them, in which patients can be monitored when a face-to-face consultation is not necessary or cannot be carried out. Through the COMETA project (COntrol como Meta en la Era de la Telemedicina en el Asma, Control as a Goal in the Age of Telemedicine in Asthma), a group of experts addressed in depth the asthmatic pathology, analyzing in detail the existing problems in order to achieve control and propose solutions to situations such as those we are currently experiencing with the COVID-19 pandemic.